The Racquet

Share this post
Medvedev loses a match?
theracquet.substack.com

Medvedev loses a match?

Dimitrov's slices, redirecting vs generating pace, slow courts?

Matthew Willis
Oct 14, 2021
8
9
Share this post
Medvedev loses a match?
theracquet.substack.com

Yesterday in Indian Wells Daniil Medvedev lost a match on a hard court. As this doesn’t happen very often these days I thought I’d take a look at why.

Medvedev lost to Grigor Dimitrov, despite being up 6-4 4-1 at one point. While Medvedev certainly started to spray unusual errors and looked understandably jaded after his incredible run of recent form, Dimitrov did a bunch of things extremely well to pull off the upset.

Medvedev came up with some funny lines after the match:

“I've never been broken 3 consecutive times on hard courts before. This shows how slow the courts are. Like clay.”

I think Medvedev may be forgetting that this has actually happened a bunch of times, even on faster hard courts. Off the top of my head: vs Gasquet (Montpellier 2018), vs Simon (Marseille 2020), and most recently against Djokovic in the Australian Open final this year. But the ‘like clay’ line is interesting, I’ll get back to that in a bit.

Medvedev to his credit also lavished praise on Dimitrov:

“(about Dimitrov) I have not much to say. He played second part of the match better than anybody did against me in US Open that I won. So again, playing this level, I don't see him losing to anybody, but let's see the result.”

The Medvedev jinx-watch is now most definitely on, but Dimitrov did do some things that other opponents of Medvedev haven’t been able to recently.

Dimitrov finished the match having sliced 70%(!) of his backhands, which is a hell of a lot, even for him (he usually averages in the 40-50’s). In an extremely stark contrast, Medvedev hit just 9% of his backhands as slice. It’s about as close to opposite backhand strategies as you can get, with Dimitrov probably preferring his slice backhand to his topspin backhand and Medvedev avoiding his, relatively underdeveloped, slice backhand at all costs.

But Dimitrov did change things up in set two. For much of set one, despite still slicing a fair amount, Dimitrov played into Medvedev’s hands quite regularly.

In set one Dimitrov (near end) was still trying to hit through his backhand with topspin pretty regularly. This usually resulted in Medvedev getting the sorts of balls he likes on his stronger backhand wing, ie lots of pace and bounce for him to use and redirect.

Medvedev loves pace. The Russian absorbs and redirects pace on hard courts better than perhaps anyone since Djokovic. In set one Dimitrov would routinely try to hit backhand drives like the above, and no matter how big the Bulgarian hit cross court Medvedev would be there ready and waiting to absorb that shot and take control of the point, like some relentless, sentient trampoline. But what Medvedev doesn’t like as much as redirecting the pace of others is having to generate his own power, especially on slower courts. And Dimitrov, in set two onwards, did a significantly better job of forcing Medvedev to create that pace:

Medvedev (far end) would obviously want to be doing better here, but from set two onwards Dimitrov was far more patient from his backhand corner. The overwhelming majority of backhands from Dimitrov would be low or no-pace slices into both Medvedev corners. And Medvedev didn’t have a consistent answer. Either the Russian would make an error as above, or he’d reply with a ball Dimitrov could attack.
Dimitrov (far end) would stick with his slices until he coaxed the right ball to attack, at which point he would be as aggressive as possible off his forehand wing. Medvedev tried hitting into both Dimitrov’s backhand and forehand as an answer to the slice, but going into the Dimitrov backhand just meant another annoying slice to deal with, and going into the forehand meant getting hurt by Dimitrov’s biggest offensive strength. Two bad options.
This happened again and again. Dimitrov’s slice would force Medvedev into the ‘two bad options’ scenario, and he’d keep hitting slices until he had the right forehand ball to attack.
By match point Medvedev had thoroughly had enough of dealing with slices.

In the previous rounds Medvedev faced:

  • Krajinovic: 26% slice backhands

  • McDonald: 20% slice backhand

20% is about average (or even slightly high) for what Medvedev has faced in his recent run of incredible form on the North American hard courts. Dimitrov, and his 70% slice dominant game-style and strategy, was a jarring departure.

After the slice

A good slice alone isn’t enough though. It’s what Dimitrov was able to do to extend points, and then back up the slices, that made this such a good performance from the Bulgarian.

Firstly Dimitrov’s blocked returns negated Medvedev’s serving advantage more effectively than earlier rounds:

And secondly, after Dimitrov was able to work his way into points, the Bulgarian set about with his patient backhand strategy of slices to coax the right ball for his forehand to attack. Medvedev was clearly aware of this dynamic developing in set two and so tried to extend points to out-run Dimitrov instead. This resulted in an abnormally high number of longer points but backfired in part because Dimitrov, thanks to his more natural rally weapons, had the easier time ending points with winners, offensive groundstrokes, or Medvedev forced errors:

Forehand winners:

  • Dimitrov: 17

  • Medvedev: 6

Forced errors:

  • Dimitrov: 28

  • Medvedev: 40

Medvedev still narrowly won the short points against Dimitrov (usually on the back of landing a big 1st serve), as he had in his previous rounds. But not only did Dimitrov push more points than Medvedev was used to into the longer ranges, but Dimitrov was winning way more of those long points:

Dimitrov found his biggest edge against Medvedev in the longer points. This was thanks to the ‘two bad options’ dynamic Medvedev found himself in explained above. Dimitrov, largely thanks to his slice and greater ability to generate his own pace on his forehand side, won the long point battle decisively.

Medvedev’s weakness?

The above isn’t particularly new information. Both Nadal and Federer have used the slice particularly well against Medvedev in the past to exploit the Russian’s sometime annoyance with having to generate his own power. And Gilles Simon, who slices about as rarely as Medvedev but hits relatively low power and flat set of groundstrokes, owns a perfect H2H against Medvedev. The interesting thing about all this however, is the view it gives to the competitive landscape and the conditions on tour. Firstly, all the talk about Indian Wells being slow this week made me realise that the reason it’s being noticed so much is because we really don’t have any other medium-slow hard courts at the top of the men’s tour anymore. CPI (court pace index) isn’t a perfect metric but if we go back to 2019 which is the last time there were comprehensive figures for court speed, Indian Wells is a lone outlier in terms of medium-slow hard court speed:

Indian Wells is the only medium slow hard court on the CPI. Every other hard court is either medium or (mostly) medium fast and the ace and return rates also bear this out. This year it was measured at 31.2

The US Open was regarded as the fastest its been in years this year, the last time the Australian Open was measured it landed around 40 (or medium fast), and the days of Miami also being a medium slow hard court were gone when the tournament moved out of Crandon Park a few years ago The good news for Medvedev is that the medium-slow hard courts, that are ‘like clay’ are all but extinct these days. Indian Wells remains the exception at least at Masters 1000 and Slam level.

The other good news for Medvedev is that men’s elite tennis doesn’t really have many good slice backhands to replicate what Dimitrov pulled off yesterday. The Top 10 as of this coming Monday will be:

  • Djokovic

  • Medvedev

  • Tsitsipas

  • Zverev

  • Rublev

  • Nadal

  • Berrettini

  • Thiem

  • Ruud

  • Hurkacz

Djokovic, Nadal and Berrettini (and more recently Thiem) all have good slices. But Nadal is currently out for the rest of the year, Djokovic is uncertain when he’ll next play, and Berrettini’s slice isn’t as good as Dimitrov’s (offensively it’s comparable but defensively Dimitrov’s is far superior). The elite competitive landscape, and current conditions on hard courts, don’t exactly present a large number of matchup or surface problems for Medvedev.

And so, despite Dimitrov playing a wonderful match to grab the win yesterday, don’t expect Medvedev’s hype and momentum train to derail any time soon. The Russian is still the best player in the world right now form-wise, and he’ll probably relish the hard courts and opponents that round out the season far more than those in the desert of Indian Wells.

Probably just a blip.

— MW

Top & Bottom: Matthew Stockman/Getty

Twitter @MattRacquet

I’ll see paid subscribers on Sunday.

The Racquet goes out twice a week, a (free) piece every Thursday and a (paid) analysis piece every Sunday/Monday. You can subscribe here:

// Looking for more?

Most recent:

The Racquet
Domestic Abuse In Sport and Tennis
The ATP has announced that their “‘safeguarding report’ is complete and that they will now get to work on a safeguarding strategy relating to all matters of abuse, including domestic violence.” The ATP has also launched an “internal investigation into…
Read more
8 months ago · 6 likes · 7 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Murray's Serving Problem
Andy Murray lost to Casper Ruud yesterday in San Diego. While there’s certainly no shame in that loss, Ruud is No.10 in the world and having his career-best season after all, Murray has high standards, understandably, and probably thinks he should be more competitive in these matches…
Read more
8 months ago · 9 likes · 2 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
The First Four Shots Meme
During the Djokovic Zverev match, in the men’s semi finals of the US Open, there was a 53 shot rally on set point. Zverev won it, saving the first set point in that game. Djokovic then won a 16 shot rally on the very next point, also a break/set point, to take a two sets to one lead. Ma…
Read more
9 months ago · 7 likes · 2 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Medvedev Crosses The Moat
Women’s final: Raducanu return analysis Anyone watching the men’s final would have been able to work out what was happening for the most part, so, for once, this match really doesn’t need too much explaining. Djokovic, physically and mentally exhausted after a tough season and under the pressure of trying to complete the calendar year Grand Slam for the…
Read more
9 months ago · 7 likes · 2 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Raducanu Returns
Leylah Fernandez 1st serve points won by round: 65% vs Konjuh in 1st Round 80% vs Kanepi in 2nd Round 78% vs Osaka in 3rd Round 66% vs Kerber in 4th Round 70% vs Svitolina in quarterfinals 68% vs Sabalenka in semifinals 56% vs Raducanu in the final There are lots of impressive things about Raducanu. She’s extremely balanced on both forehand and backhand wings, …
Read more
9 months ago · 8 likes · 5 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Sliderman
Novak Djokovic is going for the extremely elusive ‘Calendar Year Grand Slam’ this fortnight in New York, i.e winning all four Slams in a row in the same year. I, and others, have written a lot about Djokovic recently, which is unsurprising considering he’s been the best player in the world for large parts of the last decade. And while one of Novak’s big…
Read more
9 months ago · 9 likes · 3 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Rublev's Serve Problem
Neither the men’s or the women’s Cincinnati finals were eventful at all, both completely routine. But one of the matches did feature something I want to go a bit deeper on. Barty d Teichmann: 6-3, 6-1 Zverev d Rublev: 6-2, 6-3 After some crazy ATP semi-finals, in which Medvedev…
Read more
10 months ago · 4 likes · 7 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
A New Playstyle Meta Approaches
After watching Opelka upset Tsitsipas followed by Medvedev defeating Isner in Toronto, I tweeted this…
Read more
10 months ago · 5 likes · 6 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Game, Set, Shit
This will undoubtably be one of the dumber issues of the Racquet I write, but here we go. Yesterday, during his win over Aslan Karatsev in Toronto, Karen Khachanov got in hot water over some particular bits of language. The Russian was given a point penalty for an audible obscenity, down break point, and resultantly lost his serve…
Read more
10 months ago · 4 likes · 3 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Sinner's Serve
Jannik Sinner has put a stop to his mid-season slump in form to reach the Washington final this week. Tonight he plays Mackenzie McDonald for the trophy. Something interesting happened with Sinner’s serve after his round one loss to Jack Draper on the grass at Queens a month or so ago. Sinner went back to the serving motion he used throughout his junior …
Read more
10 months ago · 4 likes · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Wimbledon Final Analysis
Note: I make small edits to these posts if I find mistakes, or if I have anything to add. You can see the most recent version by tapping the title (opens web version) at the top of this issue. Djokovic d Berrettini: 6-7(4), 6-4, 6-4, 6-3 First off I’m just going to quickly go over how much more of a step up this match was for Berrettini, in relation to hi…
Read more
a year ago · 7 likes · 20 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Medvedev Loves(?)The Clay
Danil Medvedev hates the clay, then he loves the clay, then he hates the clay, and now he uh… loves it again. The Russian has been playing some very good tennis in week one of Roland Garros. So good in fact that some may be left wondering whether his…
Read more
a year ago · 10 likes · 4 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Naomi Osaka Boycotts The Press
Naomi Osaka yesterday: “I am writing this to say that I am not going to do any press during Roland Garros. I’ve often felt that people have no regard for athletes' mental health and this rings true whenever I see a press conference or partake in one. We're often sat there and asked questions that we've been asked multiple times before or asked questions …
Read more
a year ago · 10 likes · 8 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
The Federer Redux
Roger Federer played in Geneva on Tuesday for just his third match in the last 15 months. He lost. His opponent was Pablo Andújar, a solid clay courter in decent form on the back of a busy slate of clay events so far this year. Federer was a break up in set three, having played mostly impressive tennis for the latter two sets, but was foiled by some exc…
Read more
a year ago · 12 likes · 2 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Let's Stop Screwing The Umpires On Clay
I’ve wanted to write something on this topic for a while, but two things happened today in Rome that gave me a good excuse. Number 1. Tsitsipas, locked in a very tight 1st set tiebreak against Berrettini, hit this shot (video here…
Read more
a year ago · 9 likes · 10 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
The Modernisation Of Tennis
Tennis, In Need Of A Saviour? Last week Patrick Mouratoglou, the occasionally controversial coach of Serena Williams, made some rather bold claims about the state of tennis while promoting his new ‘Ultimate Tennis Showdown’ tournament: Mouratoglou: “Ten years ago the average age of the tennis fan was 51 years old. Today it’s 61. In ten years it’s going to…
Read more
2 years ago · 18 likes · 3 comments · Matthew Willis
9
Share this post
Medvedev loses a match?
theracquet.substack.com
9 Comments

Create your profile

0 subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)

Skip for now

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.

Hann
Oct 15, 2021Liked by Matthew Willis

Thank you so much for this insightful analysis. You’re helping us deeply understand the sport we love.

I have a question about this part:

“This resulted in an abnormally high number of longer points but backfired in part because Dimitrov, thanks to his more natural rally weapons”

What does ‘Natural rally weapons’ mean here?

Expand full comment
ReplyCollapse
1 reply by Matthew Willis
Mark Newman
Oct 14, 2021Liked by Matthew Willis

Somehow these analyses keep getting better. So interesting and well presented, thanks.

Expand full comment
ReplyCollapse
1 reply by Matthew Willis
7 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2022 Matthew Willis
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Publish on Substack Get the app
Substack is the home for great writing