The Racquet

Share this post

Soft Athletes?

theracquet.substack.com

Soft Athletes?

Another terrible culture war, softening of society, and the stakes at play

Matthew Willis
Jul 29, 2021
13
4
Share
Share this post

Soft Athletes?

theracquet.substack.com

World No.2 Naomi Osaka skipped Roland Garros and Wimbledon to focus on her mental health. After losing in the third round of the Olympics this week, her comeback tournament, she then said this:

“I feel like I should be used to it by now but at the same time, I think the scale of everything is a bit hard because of the break that I took.”

A few days after Osaka’s loss, Simone Biles, widely regarded as one of the best gymnasts of all time, pulled out of multiple events with a similar justification.

The reaction has been predictable, noisy, and angry. A mixture of desperate-for-attention press and a swathe of angry blue-checks who think Osaka and Biles are ‘soft’. The latest episode of the current obsession with turning everything and anything into well worn culture wars.

One of the irritating things about this latest episode is that I’m actually quite sympathetic to the argument that parts of the world are ‘soft’ in 2021. After all there are plenty of reasons for that to be the case. Since the 1940’s there are more and more democracies and fewer and fewer autocracies, there have been no battles between major powers for seventy-plus years, a steep reduction in overall battle deaths since the 1950s, and there’s been an enormous decrease in the number of people living in extreme poverty in large parts of the world. Stakes are probably lower right now on average, at least in an absolute rather than relative sense, than at any point in our recorded history. Humans that are alive right now, certainly in most western countries, can likely afford to be softer than ever before, with our technological and sociological progression enabling a wider comfort zone.

There are productive debates to be had about the merits of things like ‘everyone’s a winner’, or ‘equity-above-all-else’ schooling, as well as the western world’s current definitions, and treatments, of ‘mental health’, all to a backdrop of a world which still ruthlessly rewards perseverance and hard work over quitting-early and indolence. But that nuanced debate about how ‘soft’ the world is simply doesn’t apply in every scenario of someone choosing to prioritise themsleves. That would be insane.

And yet here we are.

Naomi Osaka is one of the top two female tennis players on earth right now at age 23. She’s won four Slams and recently occupied the No.1 ranking spot. Simone Biles won national tournaments with broken toes, succeeded in spite of sexual assault from the doctor of USA Gymnastics, and, among other gritty and notable achievements, ascended to the absolute pinnacle of a deeply competitive sport. She is 24. I really don’t think it’s possible to accurately label these people, who have already proven their work and mettle to such extreme degrees, ‘soft’. It would be like watching someone succeed for 99% of their life and then writing them off as an abject and weak failure because they had a bad month at work. There is far more evidence in favour of both Osaka and Biles being mentally tough and resilient than there is for them to be ‘soft’. Any other conclusion would just be an overdose on recency bias, in the midst of a global pandemic no less.

One of the biggest problems with armchair culture-war-of-words is that it’s impossible to know what would have happened had these players or athletes persevered through their respective struggles. Had Osaka played Roland Garros and Wimbledon perhaps she would have been fine, maybe she even would have gone deep in each tournament. Or perhaps she would have broken down in the face of press like Jennifer Capriati did in 1999, forcing more mental strife and an even longer break from the sport. Had Biles not pulled out of events this week in Tokyo perhaps she would have been ok, maybe she would have won multiple gold medals. Or perhaps, given her account of having a case of ‘the twisties’ (a well known mental block in which gymnasts lose their spatial awareness in the middle of complex skills), she would have suffered a terrible, career-ending injury. History is unfortunately littered with examples of the more sinister reality materializing, sportsmen and women who didn’t protect themselves simply because they didn’t know a reality existed where they could. British Olympian and speed skater Elise Christie pushed herself so hard to compete in a 1000m heat, despite a serious ankle injury, that she ‘broke herself as a person’ and the aftermath nearly killed her. American Olympian and gymnast Dominique Moceanu competed, at just 14 years old, with a tibial stress fracture which led to a bad fall on to her head. These are not ‘soft’ people, and, in dangerous events like gymnastics, these are not low stakes.

Square peg, round hole

There are upsides and downsides to a society becoming softer, much of which would inarguably have been considered extreme luxury by our more violent and generally poorer ancestors. We should clearly acknowledge ways in which this softening will hurt the human race, perhaps harmfully shielding people from necessary learning and development, coddling us into a false sense of security in the face of a future black swan event and/or war, or restricting the most talented and able among us in the name of well-meaning but impotent umbrella terms like ‘fairness’. Perhaps above all we should avoid fetishising weakness and failure at all costs. But we should also appreciate and understand the extremely modern and nascent privilege where many human beings, not just professional athletes, can, more so than ever before, proudly prioritise their health and guard themselves from harm, as a productive evolution of our societies and humanity.

Parts of the media’s infatuated insistence with trying to jam every trending square-peg topic into the round hole of whatever the latest culture war is, represents a deeply unhelpful direction. Neither Osaka nor Biles belong in the culture war of ‘is our society too soft’. Two world class athletes, who have already surpassed numerous obstacles that would have been too much for most of the population, don’t fit that shape. No matter how hard you push.

—MW

If you have any questions on the above, let me know in the comments. No question is dumb.

I’ll see you on Monday for Olympic final match analysis.

Twitter @MattRacquet

The Racquet goes out twice a week, a (free) topical piece every Thursday and a (paid) analysis piece every Sunday/Monday.

// Looking for more?

The Racquet
In Defence Of Olympic Tennis
Olympic tennis has an odd place in the minds of many fans. Tennis was removed as an Olympic sport after the 1924 games, due to a dispute between the International Lawn Tennis Federation and the International Olympic Committee over how to define amateur players, before finally being reinstated in 1988. For a seriously large chunk of Olympic history, tenn…
Read more
2 years ago · 5 likes · 4 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Wimbledon Final Analysis
Note: I make small edits to these posts if I find mistakes, or if I have anything to add. You can see the most recent version by tapping the title (opens web version) at the top of this issue. Djokovic d Berrettini: 6-7(4), 6-4, 6-4, 6-3 First off I’m just going to quickly go over how much more of a step up this match was for Berrettini, in relation to hi…
Read more
2 years ago · 7 likes · 20 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Wimbledon - Slip Slidin' Away
Sadly we had back-to-back retirements due to injury on Centre Court at Wimbledon yesterday. First Adrian Mannarino injured his right knee, thanks to a slip while leading two sets to one over Roger Federer. And then Serena Williams injured her hamstring in a more innocuous looking, but still slip-induced, accident against Aliaksandra Sasnovich. These are…
Read more
2 years ago · 6 likes · 4 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Berrettini Conquers Queens
Berrettini d Norrie: 6-4, 6-7(5), 6-3 Berrettini now has 3 titles on clay, 2 on grass, and 0 on hard courts. Safe to say the dude seems to like the natural surfaces (although competition on grass is weaker than on both clay and hard). The Italian was by far the best player in London throughout the week and enters Wimbledon with plenty of hype…
Read more
2 years ago · 8 likes · 9 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Medvedev Loves(?)The Clay
Danil Medvedev hates the clay, then he loves the clay, then he hates the clay, and now he uh… loves it again. The Russian has been playing some very good tennis in week one of Roland Garros. So good in fact that some may be left wondering whether his…
Read more
2 years ago · 10 likes · 4 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Naomi Osaka Boycotts The Press
Naomi Osaka yesterday: “I am writing this to say that I am not going to do any press during Roland Garros. I’ve often felt that people have no regard for athletes' mental health and this rings true whenever I see a press conference or partake in one. We're often sat there and asked questions that we've been asked multiple times before or asked questions …
Read more
2 years ago · 10 likes · 8 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
The Federer Redux
Roger Federer played in Geneva on Tuesday for just his third match in the last 15 months. He lost. His opponent was Pablo Andújar, a solid clay courter in decent form on the back of a busy slate of clay events so far this year. Federer was a break up in set three, having played mostly impressive tennis for the latter two sets, but was foiled by some exc…
Read more
2 years ago · 12 likes · 2 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Let's Stop Screwing The Umpires On Clay
I’ve wanted to write something on this topic for a while, but two things happened today in Rome that gave me a good excuse. Number 1. Tsitsipas, locked in a very tight 1st set tiebreak against Berrettini, hit this shot (video here…
Read more
2 years ago · 9 likes · 10 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Monte Carlo Final - Tsitsipas vs Rublev 🎾
VALERY HACHE/AFP via Getty Images Tsitsipas d Rublev: 6-3, 6-3 A one sided, yet still interesting match. The keys today were: Who created more free or easy points on serve Who got to hit more forehands Tsitsipas absolutely dominated in both (related) categories…
Read more
2 years ago · 11 likes · 3 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Daniil Medvedev Does *Not* Like The Clay
Photo by Alex Caparros/Getty Images Daniil Medvedev, before unfortunately testing positive for COVID and having to withdraw from Monte Carlo, gave a very funny interview about clay courts. After apparently getting taken to the woodshed by Rafael Nadal…
Read more
2 years ago · 10 likes · 8 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
The Modernisation Of Tennis
Tennis, In Need Of A Saviour? Last week Patrick Mouratoglou, the occasionally controversial coach of Serena Williams, made some rather bold claims about the state of tennis while promoting his new ‘Ultimate Tennis Showdown’ tournament: Mouratoglou: “Ten years ago the average age of the tennis fan was 51 years old. Today it’s 61. In ten years it’s going to…
Read more
3 years ago · 18 likes · 3 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Tennis' Identity Crisis
Welcome to the new subscribers! If you’re reading this but haven’t subscribed to The Racquet, click/tap below to join thousands of other tennis players & fans (it’s free and usually goes out weekly). Issues range from deep tennis analysis & the future of the sport to more topical stuff like today’s…
Read more
2 years ago · 6 likes · 1 comment · Matthew Willis

Top: Laurence Griffiths/Getty

13
4
Share
Share this post

Soft Athletes?

theracquet.substack.com
4 Comments
Susie Reid
Jul 29, 2021Liked by Matthew Willis

Biles has to be one of the most mentally tough athletes ever to hv performed at that level in such a precise and precarious sport. Tiny loss of focus and as you said, potentially terrible consequences. To hv taken herself out of the comp was extraordinarily brave but also demonstrated great self awareness and wisdom. She knew.

The “twisties” in gym cannot be compared to the yips in say serving or putting, even tho they result in loss of form. They do however tell me that nerves did kick in ( due to what extremes of stress and pressure, we can only guess at). However, 24 is old for a gymnast and she was not at peak coming in. Her peak was in Rio and even earlier. The combo of external pressure, increasing awareness of her time and the difficult nature of these Olympics cannot hv helped.

I find Osaka’s situation different. I worry that she doesn’t love tennis or her chosen path quite enough. She is also a thinker, fully aware and pained by the inequalities she sees, and wants to be active on that front. To be admired and applauded but it makes for additional stress in the life of an elite athlete which asks basically for selfishness and an almost hermit like existence to achieve greatness. Hard balance. I am also concerned she may hv a tendency to depression ( purely conjecture) so I hope she can surround herself with ppl who care for her and not just her causes.

Expand full comment
Reply
3 replies by Matthew Willis and others
3 more comments…
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Matthew Willis
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing