Too Damn Good
Auger-Aliassime wins his first ATP title in Rotterdam: serve-return analysis, rally strategy, serve+1's, forehand-backhand ratio
Auger-Aliassime d Tsitsipas: 6-4, 6-2
An extremely easy bit of analysis. Auger-Aliassime (FAA) played flawless tennis and enjoyed a significant serve-return edge against Tsitsipas all match long. The Canadian didn’t dip once. A stunning performance worthy of his first ATP Tour title.
There are a few key areas, which cascaded onto one another, which decided this match:
Serve and return
Auger-Aliassime and Tsitsipas posted similar avg serve speeds (especially on 1st serve), but a mixture of superior Auger-Aliassime placement and worse Tsitsipas returning meant that far fewer of Auger-Aliassime’s 1st serves actually came back:
1st Serve Unreturned
Auger-Aliassime: 47%
Tsitsipas: 32%
And even when the ball did come back in play, Auger-Aliassime usually had a relatively routine serve+1 (2nd shot after the serve) compared to Tsistipas:
Auger-Aliassime enjoyed a repeatable serve strategy for most of the match, aiming into the Tsistipas backhand and profiting:
And even when Auger-Aliassime did serve into the Tsitsipas forehand, Auger-Aliassime still usually had the forehands he wanted lined up:
Auger-Aliassime finished the match losing just two(!) 1st serve points.
In stark contrast, Auger-Aliassime’s return performance, off both forehand and backhand, was solid:
Auger-Aliassime found some solid body and into-the-backhand 2nd serves over the course of the match (winning 11/16 or 69% of 2nd serves pts compared to Tsitsipas’ 8/24 or 33%).
All of this meant that Auger-Aliassime cruised by mostly untroubled on his own serve, and managed to get stuck into Tsitsipas’ service games pretty consistently. Tsistipas didn’t create a single break point all match and the only 30-30’s and Deuce’s he created on Auger-Aliassime’s serve were almost always wiped out with aces/unreturnable serves or serve+1’s:
Rally
Even when Tsitsipas did manage to work his way into points and avoid some of the serve-return advantage that Auger-Aliassime was enjoying, things often didn’t go well for him:
A superior serve-return and rally dynamic meant that Auger-Aliassime’s forehand strength got to shine. Tsitsipas’ didn’t.
Forehand & backhand groundstrokes:
Tsitsipas: 50 forehands, 60 backhands (45% forehands)
Auger-Aliassime: 78 forehands, 49 backhands (61% forehands)
Too good
As I’ve written about a bunch this season already, Auger-Aliassime’s serve and forehand will always take the glory, but his backhand has to hold up long enough to enable part of that glory. It did once again today, his forehand from his backhand corner was exceptional all match long, as was his 1st serve power and accuracy. There are few greater weapons in men’s tennis right now than that combo.
As for Tsitsipas, I think he can play better. His serve still looks a little worse than usual after his off-season elbow surgery, and the rest of his game is probably suffering subtly as a result. As I wrote in Tsitsipas’ improvement analysis at the end of 2021, unless his return and defensive backhand performances can improve, his serve is going to be required to do a hell of a lot of heavy lifting to cover up those cracks. His serve wasn’t quite there today and he got smoked. The cracks were visible. I’d caution against reading too much into this result from Tsitsipas’ perspective however, as there are some tiny signs of improvement in those areas so far this year, even if they’re probably too nascent to show up in a match at this level yet.
But on days like this where Auger-Aliassime was playing as well as he was, there’s very little anyone on the tour can do. The Canadian was not only winning all the points he should be winning (big serves, forehand serve +1 and forehand rallies), which happened to make up the majority of points today, but he even won most of the points he shouldn’t be winning:
At some point you just have to shrug your shoulders and say ‘too damn good’.
—MW
Twitter: @mattracquet
See you on Thursday
The Racquet goes out twice a week, a (free) piece every Thursday and a (paid) analysis piece every Sunday/Monday. You can subscribe here:
Top: Rico Brouwer/Soccrates/Getty, Bottom: SANDER KONING/ANP/AFP via Getty
Most recent:
Incredible analysis. That forehand to backhand ratio, holy moly.
Also a Montrealer, I must admit being truly delighted for Auger-Aliassime (also sorry for Tsitsipas, though) = what a HUGE relief this Rotterdam title must feel/be for Auger-Aliassime! Finally!
Really enjoyed your detailed analysis, Matthew, many thanks. Fun reading/learning for all of us!
While following both Auger-Aliassime (upwards) and Tsitsipas (downwards) small, but very real, shifts in terms of self-belief, self-confidence, coaching/training "arrangements", etc, over the last year or so, the thought came more than once to mind of Tsitsipas perhaps considering having a talk with del Potro over a couple of Quimera glasses, à la Auger-Aliassime with Uncle Nadal. Wouldn't hurt, and might turn out to be, at the very least, helpful for Tsitsipas, who knows?