The Racquet

Share this post
A New Playstyle Meta Approaches
theracquet.substack.com

A New Playstyle Meta Approaches

Medvedev dismantles the servers in Toronto, big serving counterpunchers, serve and return trends

Matthew Willis
Aug 16, 2021
7
7
Share this post
A New Playstyle Meta Approaches
theracquet.substack.com

After watching Opelka upset Tsitsipas followed by Medvedev defeating Isner in Toronto, I tweeted this:

Twitter avatar for @mattracquetMatthew Willis @mattracquet
Results (Tsitsipas stunlocked by Opelka’s serve & Medvedev dismantling Isner’s) helps my old theory that a return of serve edge will usually be a more meaningful competitive advantage in modern elite ATP tennis than a serving edge. They all serve well. Not all of them return well

August 15th 2021

23 Retweets444 Likes

Medvedev followed up that win over Isner by routining another giant in Reilly Opelka in straight sets in the Toronto final last night. Medvedev moves to a 9-1 head to head winning record against the triumvirate of big servers — Isner, Raonic & Opelka. Tsitsipas, who comparatively struggles with his return of serve on a hard court, has a 5 wins and 5 losses record against those same three players.

The reasons for the above are multiple, but primarily Medvedev has solid returns on both forehand and backhand on a hard court, and is helped by his double hander and lanky, octopus-esque limbs allowing him to smother and cover an unusually large area deep in the court a la Nadal. Whereas Tsitsipas’ backhand return in particular is weaker, partially because the Greek doesn’t have much of a blocked return on that wing (apparently because he’s more confident in his topspin backhand than the slice1). On clay it’s a different story, with Tsitsipas having more time to wind up those shots and take full swings rather than block.

But back to the beginning: is the return a more precious and meaningful competitive advantage than the serve these days at the very top of the game? Last week I posted the serve performance trends for the past decade, with the summary being that most service performance categories had improved steadily over the last ten years. Top ranked players have gotten taller, they’re hitting faster 1st and 2nd serves, and they’re holding serve more often now on average than ten years ago.

So what’s happened to the return performance over the past decade?

Notes: These are all year end rankings apart from 2021 which is the current ranking. I’ve combined some of the 2020 and 2021 figures because the pandemic screwed up some of 2020’s numbers. Federer isn't included in the Top 10 for 2020 or 2021, despite being in the official rankings, because he hasn't played enough matches (there simply wasn’t enough performance data for him). He’s replaced by the next best player in each of those years.

As serve performance has trended up over the past decade, return performance has trended down. You can do some interesting stuff overlaying and comparing these but perhaps the most satisfying is the inverse height to return performance rollercoaster:

So, as serve performance has mostly gotten better over the past decade, and return performance has gotten worse, it would make sense that a good returner would be able to find more of a competitive edge as long as his serve kept pace with the improving pack.

The only two players in the top 10 in both 2011 and 2021 are Djokovic and Nadal (Federer technically is still in the top 10 this year but entirely because of frozen COVID rankings and he hasn’t played enough to be included in this due to lack of performance data). Nadal and Djokovic are two of the best returners to ever play the game and both have upped their serve speeds and overall serve performances in recent years to keep pace on that front. But guess who ranks at number three behind Nadal and Djokovic in the 2019 and 2021 (so far) seasons when it comes to return games won in the top 10?

Daniil Medvedev.

Update: Medvedev actually finished the 2021 season with the best overall return performance on hard courts out of the top 5:

Along those lines, Opelka came up with an apt description for Medvedev:

Opelka is essentially describing an emerging play-style meta that hasn’t really existed in this way until quite recently. Medvedev and Zverev can both embody it, and it centres around (aside from being very tall) having a huge 1st serve, to fit in with the decade trend of bigger and better serving, combined with excellent athleticism and return game stickiness.

Medvedev has the tools to blend in with, or even occasionally surpass, the other elite servers at the top of the game…

  • 1st Serve Points Won: Medvedev 88%, Opelka 63%

  • 2nd Serve Points Won: Medvedev 62%, Opelka 38%

  • Unreturned 1st serves: Medvedev 54%, Opelka 33%

  • Unreturned 2nd serves: Medvedev 58%, Opelka 29%

  • Points Won Under 5 Shots: Medvedev 43, Opelka 42

  • Points Won Over 5 Shots: Medvedev 29, Opelka 14

… but perhaps his biggest edge comes in having an unusually (at least historically) good return performance for such a tall, big server. The Russian absolutely dismantled arguably the two best servers in the game over the last 48 hours in back to back matches, creating giant killing break points in 11 of the 18 return games he played against Isner and Opelka.

A new playstyle approaches…

Daniil Medvedev is a threat in ways which have, historically more often than not, been inverse areas of skill for tall (6ft6+) players. If you were going to plot these evolving skills like video game characters you’d get something like this:

This is simplistic and is just for a fun visualisation (and there are of course exceptions) but this is sort of how you’d imagine a 6ft 6/7+ player’s attributes would have historically looked (left) compared to the new, more balanced, Medvedev archetype (right).

The ‘Big 3’ of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic, especially the latter two, have built much of their kingdoms on ruthlessly exposing the weak spots of those who challenge them. Perhaps in some strange form of natural selection, the response from part of the next generation is to plug some of those holes by becoming more balanced in these ways mentioned above — evolution towards simultaneously great servers and great movers & returners (more on this here). It’s going to be fascinating in the coming years to see whether the ‘big serving counterpunchers’ of Medvedev and Zverev will outperform the slightly more strength specific, but less balanced in terms of serve and return performance, players like Tsitsipas, Berrettini & Shapovalov.2 Perhaps once the Big 3 retire, areas of weakness won’t be exploited so easily.3

Medvedev certainly has weak spots of his own, and the arguments above start to fall apart a bit on the clay as I’ve written about here and here. But considering 60-65% of the elite calendar is played on Medvedev’s preferred hard court surface, the Russian is bringing an extremely interesting and effective combination of skills to the table.

Serve or return? Why not both says Daniil.

— MW

If you have any questions on the above, let me know in the comments. No question is dumb.

See you on Thursday.

Twitter @MattRacquet

The Racquet goes out twice a week, a (free) topical piece every Thursday and a (paid) analysis piece every Sunday/Monday. You can subscribe here:

Top: Vaughn Ridley/Getty

// Looking for more?

Most recent:

The Racquet
Game, Set, Shit
This will undoubtably be one of the dumber issues of the Racquet I write, but here we go. Yesterday, during his win over Aslan Karatsev in Toronto, Karen Khachanov got in hot water over some particular bits of language. The Russian was given a point penalty for an audible obscenity, down break point, and resultantly lost his serve…
Read more
10 months ago · 4 likes · 3 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Sinner's Serve
Jannik Sinner has put a stop to his mid-season slump in form to reach the Washington final this week. Tonight he plays Mackenzie McDonald for the trophy. Something interesting happened with Sinner’s serve after his round one loss to Jack Draper on the grass at Queens a month or so ago. Sinner went back to the serving motion he used throughout his junior …
Read more
10 months ago · 4 likes · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Soft Athletes?
World No.2 Naomi Osaka skipped Roland Garros and Wimbledon to focus on her mental health. After losing in the third round of the Olympics this week, her comeback tournament, she then said this: “I feel like I should be used to it by now but at the same time, I think the scale of everything is a bit hard because of the break that I took…
Read more
10 months ago · 10 likes · 3 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Wimbledon Final Analysis
Note: I make small edits to these posts if I find mistakes, or if I have anything to add. You can see the most recent version by tapping the title (opens web version) at the top of this issue. Djokovic d Berrettini: 6-7(4), 6-4, 6-4, 6-3 First off I’m just going to quickly go over how much more of a step up this match was for Berrettini, in relation to hi…
Read more
a year ago · 7 likes · 20 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Berrettini Conquers Queens
Berrettini d Norrie: 6-4, 6-7(5), 6-3 Berrettini now has 3 titles on clay, 2 on grass, and 0 on hard courts. Safe to say the dude seems to like the natural surfaces (although competition on grass is weaker than on both clay and hard). The Italian was by far the best player in London throughout the week and enters Wimbledon with plenty of hype…
Read more
a year ago · 8 likes · 9 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Medvedev Loves(?)The Clay
Danil Medvedev hates the clay, then he loves the clay, then he hates the clay, and now he uh… loves it again. The Russian has been playing some very good tennis in week one of Roland Garros. So good in fact that some may be left wondering whether his…
Read more
a year ago · 10 likes · 4 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Naomi Osaka Boycotts The Press
Naomi Osaka yesterday: “I am writing this to say that I am not going to do any press during Roland Garros. I’ve often felt that people have no regard for athletes' mental health and this rings true whenever I see a press conference or partake in one. We're often sat there and asked questions that we've been asked multiple times before or asked questions …
Read more
a year ago · 10 likes · 8 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
The Federer Redux
Roger Federer played in Geneva on Tuesday for just his third match in the last 15 months. He lost. His opponent was Pablo Andújar, a solid clay courter in decent form on the back of a busy slate of clay events so far this year. Federer was a break up in set three, having played mostly impressive tennis for the latter two sets, but was foiled by some exc…
Read more
a year ago · 12 likes · 2 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Let's Stop Screwing The Umpires On Clay
I’ve wanted to write something on this topic for a while, but two things happened today in Rome that gave me a good excuse. Number 1. Tsitsipas, locked in a very tight 1st set tiebreak against Berrettini, hit this shot (video here…
Read more
a year ago · 9 likes · 10 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Monte Carlo Final - Tsitsipas vs Rublev 🎾
VALERY HACHE/AFP via Getty Images Tsitsipas d Rublev: 6-3, 6-3 A one sided, yet still interesting match. The keys today were: Who created more free or easy points on serve Who got to hit more forehands Tsitsipas absolutely dominated in both (related) categories…
Read more
a year ago · 11 likes · 3 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Daniil Medvedev Does *Not* Like The Clay
Photo by Alex Caparros/Getty Images Daniil Medvedev, before unfortunately testing positive for COVID and having to withdraw from Monte Carlo, gave a very funny interview about clay courts. After apparently getting taken to the woodshed by Rafael Nadal…
Read more
a year ago · 10 likes · 8 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
The Modernisation Of Tennis
Tennis, In Need Of A Saviour? Last week Patrick Mouratoglou, the occasionally controversial coach of Serena Williams, made some rather bold claims about the state of tennis while promoting his new ‘Ultimate Tennis Showdown’ tournament: Mouratoglou: “Ten years ago the average age of the tennis fan was 51 years old. Today it’s 61. In ten years it’s going to…
Read more
2 years ago · 18 likes · 3 comments · Matthew Willis
The Racquet
Tennis' Identity Crisis
Welcome to the new subscribers! If you’re reading this but haven’t subscribed to The Racquet, click/tap below to join thousands of other tennis players & fans (it’s free and usually goes out weekly). Issues range from deep tennis analysis & the future of the sport to more topical stuff like today’s…
Read more
a year ago · 6 likes · 1 comment · Matthew Willis
1

This has always been my hunch about Tsitsipas’ backhand, that he grew up (on clay) playing mostly topspin drives instead of slices and so became much more confident in the former than the latter. Whether or not that’s a good thing on balance (his backhand topspin is better than most but his slice/block is worse than many other single handers) is a question I’ll try to answer in another issue. My guess is probably not, but it only really presents as a problem on hard courts rather than his beloved clay.

2

Lumping Medvedev and Zverev into one bucket and Tsitsipas, Berrettini & Shapo into another is extremely simplistic. But it fits the purpose of the piece i.e the focus on serve and return skill balance.

3

This is another reminder that the competitive landscape, ie what it takes to win the biggest events, is going to be completely different pre and post Big 3 retirement. Those three represent different Slam final roadblocks compared to next gen playing against each other in those big finals.

7
Share this post
A New Playstyle Meta Approaches
theracquet.substack.com
7 Comments

Create your profile

0 subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)

Skip for now

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.

Aisyah
Sep 28, 2021Liked by Matthew Willis

Such an awesome analysis, thank you Mr. Willis!!

Expand full comment
ReplyCollapse
tm
Aug 16, 2021Liked by Matthew Willis

Medvedev's brilliant play and Opelka's wit make it harder for me to maintain my shrill opposition to the heightification of men's tennis. But maintain it I do. I think it is a danger for the sport. Perhaps there are enough Medvedev's ato keep the servebots at bay and keep the sport from suffering a fatal deskilling, but it's foolish to assume it will work out that way. We almost got an Isner-Opelka master's 1000 final and we will likely see a grand slam final of similar ilk in the future. The Anderson-Isner Wimbledon final was a warning that has been ignored. Well-run sports, like the NFL, adjust their rules to maintain the quality of the sport's play. Tennis should make appropriate rule changes. I'm open to different options. My radical solution is to move back the service line for every inch a player exceeds, say, six foot two inches. I'll leave it to Jeff Sackman to determine the exact amount needed to even things out.

Expand full comment
ReplyCollapse
5 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2022 Matthew Willis
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Publish on Substack Get the app
Substack is the home for great writing